Friday, 17 May 2013

Conflict Reviews

DCLD Group - Conflict

Presentation covered a broad range of content covering conflict. The visual presentation was very basic, consisting of a series of slides containing the written elements of the oral presentation. This meant the slides were quite dense with information; this perhaps could have been simplified into dot points. The act of simply reading off the visual presentation meant the overall impression was quite dry and lacked audience engagement. The examples used throughout were good and aided in the understanding of the topic though could've had more project specific examples to relate to the topic. Towards the end of the presentation some more project specific examples were used though examples could have been more in depth. Though there were project specific examples the concept of conflict in relation to collaboration was not fully addressed and could have been discussed further. Graphics used included a couple of graphs/charts which were used to outline different elements of conflict as well as resolution processes. Screen shots of the project were also used to aid in project specific examples.



Kinecting the Boxes - Conflict

The written presentation had simple dot points with interesting and clear visualisation. Tho oral presentation was clear and well spoken, though the speed in which the information was being presented lost engagement with the audience. The presentation contained a lot of information on the theme of conflict though it seemed a somewhat overload of information resulting in some of the main points being lost. Unfortunately the presentation only addressed interpersonal conflict, without including a broader application for conflict (e.g. hardware and software). Examples used throughout were helpful but there were only a couple of project specific examples, resulting in a weak conceptual link to the theme of collaboration. Images used were quite generic, not really aiding in understanding of their topic of conflict. Work was not referenced correctly.

No comments:

Post a Comment